Is Graffiti Art Or Vandalism Debate. Now on the other hand someone that tags a statue in a town center is considered vandalism because it is disrupting the statues message, but pro had a more convincing argument. Often the two intertwine, as some graffiti is so obviously completed by an individual/individuals who have a good eye for colour and design. Is graffiti art or vandalism debate. The graffiti debate prominent graffiti artist banksy described graffiti as a way to make the world a better place”, but for many it's simply vandalism. There has been a debate about graffiti ever since the caveman days. Although graffiti is illegal and is considered vandalism by the law, some people considered it art because, it is a way people can express themselves and let their voices be heard. First of all let’s define the word graffiti:
It is certainly not always idle or mindless vandalism as it is clear that a great deal of time and artistic design goes into some of it but it is always wilful damage of someone else’s property. While a good amount of graffiti are painted illegally on public and private properties, we should not obliterate its intrinsic quality—art. If i were to catch someone spraying ‘kilroy woz ‘ere’. There are a considerable amount of whta if's in this argument. By definition graffiti means “writing or drawings scribbled, scratched, or sprayed illicitly on a wall or other surface in a public place.”. Art is considered as a way to describe emotions of artists and it is known to be done in the traditional manner;
While A Good Amount Of Graffiti Are Painted Illegally On Public And Private Properties, We Should Not Obliterate Its Intrinsic Quality—Art.
Is graffiti art or vandalism debate. Words or drawings, especially humorous, rude, or. There is no clear answer, and it’s easy to see both sides of the debate — after all, not everyone would be happy to have their property painted without their consent. Often the two intertwine, as some graffiti is so obviously completed by an individual/individuals who have a good eye for colour and design. In closed rooms and on canvas, paper or other media. Urban art projects in cities are sometimes strategies that are recommended by authorities while working with the local councils as a form of graffiti prevention strategy.
By definition graffiti means “writing or drawings scribbled, scratched, or sprayed illicitly on a wall or other surface in a public place.”. Many people say graffiti is vandalism, but what actually is graffiti? I accept this debate but im a bit confused about which side you are on, could you include whether you are for art or for vandalism in the next round please. However, some society players still can’t answer the question, is graffiti art or vandalism? Graffiti should not be labeled as vandalism.
Is graffiti art or vandalism debate share. Graffiti is a common form of art (in some eyes) that is considered vandalism. Get your custom essay on “ art or vandalism: Art or vandalism many people dislike graffiti, thinking it to be vandalism. Prominent graffiti artist banksy described graffiti as a way to make the world a better place, but for many it's simply vandalism.
If you are puting graffiti on a building where you havent had any type of consent than its vandalism. Doc, 40 kb ppt, 5.84 mb. The street art debate ” get custom paper. But the other half of people, think that graffiti is a piece of magnificent artwork. Quite a few people consider graffiti was introduced to the world as a reply to modernism and social division.
But some graffiti has been given consent therefore it isn't vandalism. Not all graffiti is vandalism. I did this lesson for a job. If graffiti is painted on the artist’s own legal properties, it is categorized as art, not vandalism. Graffiti can be considered an art style when it can not be called vandalism.
If the graffiti is in a designated area, then it would be considered art. The debate over whether graffiti constitutes art or vandalism is incredibly complex, and depends on many factors, such as the location of a particular piece, and the quality and message of the design. In this photo essay, alexis beaumont looks at melbourne's graffiti from both sides. There is a heated debate that goes with the origination of graffiti art. First of all let’s define the word graffiti:
For example, when it applied to a canvas or when the owner gives permission. Graffiti is not an art form but a form of vandalism. I see graffiti under a bridge and on a building in my town.but graffiti is almost illegal ,it made by people has hate for society and they are almost under twenty.i don't like street art such as graffiti.vandalism is not art ,it express hate in mind.some city try clean graffiti on street but after elaze graffiti some street artist write again. Graffiti is art not vandalism because for example you might be passing a dull wall everyday, but one day you not even recognize it from the looks of it because it has been beautifully decorated and people only call it vandalism because people paint on there property without permission, i am just like “wow” so i am going to finish by saying that graffiti is a piece and a work of art!!!!! And they try to use the definition of art to excuse it.
In many cases, graffiti could be vulgar, crude and can be considered nothing but pure vandalism. The idea that a form of artistic expression could be considered vandalism is, unsurprisingly, not widespread among graffiti artists. Is graffiti art or vandalism? Graffiti can be used as artistic expression, or a form of communication, but many people consider it to be vandalism. Although graffiti is illegal and is considered vandalism by the law, some people considered it art because, it is a way people can express themselves and let their voices be heard.
There are a considerable amount of whta if's in this argument. This is because the government claims that these graffiti artists are drawing on private property. The aspect of graffiti as an underground art culture, that is intended to pass on. Unlike graffiti vandalism, “urban art” is defined as legal artwork “where permission to mark the surface has been granted by the owner of the property.” urban art is also known as street art or mural art. If i were to catch someone spraying ‘kilroy woz ‘ere’.
“it’s a symbol of rebellion, and it presents a fantastic new form of creativity, but what makes it art is an individual’s opinion. The amount of respect for graffiti is looked down upon specifically because it’s considered vandalism and the destroying of property homes. But, however much some graffiti looks pretty, it’s understandable why some consider it as vandalism. Can art ever become vandalism? The discrepancy between graffiti as both vandalism and art reached a zenith in 2010, when the then prime minister, david cameron, visited washington dc and presented barack obama with a canvas by.
Writing or drawings scribbled, scratched, or sprayed illicitly on a wall or other surface in a public place. So, is it art or vandalism? This module will lead you to reflect upon the concepts of art, vandalism and graffiti to be able to draw your conclusions and debate: Confronting these two almost opposite approaches, it allows a better understanding of this artistic form, as to whether it is considered vandalism or art. While a good amount of graffiti are painted illegally on public and private properties, we should not obliterate its intrinsic quality—art.
Now on the other hand someone that tags a statue in a town center is considered vandalism because it is disrupting the statues message, but pro had a more convincing argument. Should graffiti be considered an art form or vandalism? It is certainly not always idle or mindless vandalism as it is clear that a great deal of time and artistic design goes into some of it but it is always wilful damage of someone else’s property. “graffiti is 100% art,” says pearce. Is graffiti art or vandalism debate.
Lesson (complete) 4.1 7 reviews. Home » art » debate » graffiti » vandalism » is graffiti art or vandalism debate. The graffiti art culture is increasingly being accepted in many cities around the world. There has been a debate about graffiti ever since the caveman days. Art is considered as a way to describe emotions of artists and it is known to be done in the traditional manner;
I have to agree with ksu11 graffiti can be art & vandalism because here in atlanta there is a tunnel that is covered with graffiti and it is a tourist attraction which is considered art. A big part of society doesn’t know the difference between public art and graffiti/street art. Are graffiti art or vandalism? In this essay, i will be listing all the reasons why graffiti is art. The graffiti debate prominent graffiti artist banksy described graffiti as a way to make the world a better place”, but for many it's simply vandalism.
